“‘I need do nothing’ is a statement of allegiance, a truly undivided loyalty. Believe it for just one instant, and you will accomplish more than is given to a century of contemplation, or of struggle against temptation. “ A Course in Miracles 18-7
“Do you want to know why you came? This is why you came. It’s not to do, but rather it’s to be. It’s to be light where darkness used to be. This is the message of the day. I am Kryon, in love with humanity.” KRYON, The Recalibration of Self: Part 1, April 28, 2012, through Lee Carroll
“God said: You may feel you are giving up something to be in union and unison with Me, yet, of course, this is how you gain everything. You have everything already. Until your realization, you don’t quite gain it. Until you accept our absolute Oneness, you skirt around it. You run around the circumference of Me and, yet, you don’t quite land. You play a game called Distance or Ring Around the Rosies. You don’t come quite up to the plate.” http://www.heavenletters.org/the-king-of-the-castle.html
_______________________________________________________________
Being is the most simple thing conceivable. In fact, it is so simple that it is inconceivable for us. Our mind functions by contrasts, comparisons, evaluations which all have to end up in judgments. Obviously, to perceive differences is to judge that we are not the same as what we perceive as different. This is because our mind perceives with our body to which it identifies and the body is the visible sign of the embodiment of difference. So we tend to conceive (and confuse) being as equivalent to being separate. The concepts of limitlessness, timelessness, infiniteness, vastnesses are as difficult to grasp because our mind tries to conceive unity with a background or coloration or taste or sound of separation. But how can we really conceive being by contrasting it with not being: how can we see “un-sameness” in being? Descartes summarized it in his celebrated “Cogito, ergo sum/I think; therefore I am.”
This consideration is far from being only theoretical. Oneness is also a difficult concept to grasp. In fact, oneness, universality, being, love, and truth are absolutely the same. Only our comparative and judgmental mind perceives them as different. We cannot know the truth if we don’t recognize our oneness by believing that we are separate from each other. We cannot know real, unconditional love if we don’t recognize our sameness. Accepting our differences is not quite the same as recognizing our sameness. Accepting our differences still rests upon judgment while recognizing our sameness rests on the acknowledgment of our oneness. Love cannot be otherwise than unconditional: how could love be conditional since there is only one? Conditionality is the belief that separation is not only possible, but real. There is no separation in love, hence no condition. If love is conditional, then it is not love, it is attachment. Sense of time, space, limitation are the projection of the belief in the reality of separateness. The body is the device to create the belief in time, space, and separation, hence the belief in the reality of the physical world.
The concept of doing lies also on the idea of un-sameness. If you want to build a house, you will need a hammer, nails, and wood. You will assemble heterogeneous parts to constitute a unity which is the thought or idea of a house made visible and called a house. But it is a house only as long as the parts hold together. Its unity rests paradoxically on the separateness of its parts. That is why it needs maintenance, hence work. Doing is also totally linked to space and time. It takes time and space to build a house.
Hence doing is also totally linked to the concept of body. The mind identifying with the body cannot conceive being without doing because being is conceived as being separate. Separation is what makes us believe in the reality of doing, making or fabricating. We won’t know what it means just to BE as long as we believe in the reality of the body and in the reality of doing.
God needs do nothing to create
God did not do, make or fabricate the Universe. He did not assemble parts to create a “whole” Universe or a Universe as a whole. To create means to grow, and the meaning of Creation is eternal growth and multiplication as oneness made visible into a myriad of possibilities, all to be explored. There is no division in Creation, only multiplication. Hence the mathematics of Creation uses only WHOLE numbers. Yet all the whole numbers are contained within 1. 1 includes ALL the whole numbers. We’ll see it a little later.
Everything that is “made” or “done” or “fabricated” by human beings does not grow because it does not have a life of its own. The mathematics of fabrication lies on divisions and fractions, that is fragmentation. Life does not arise from division but multiplication. Even cells don’t really divide but multiply by a strange mathematical and harmonic “twist” of the number 1. Only what is created by multiplication has the potential to grow, to extend. A house does not grow once it is built. But put a seed in the ground and without anything to do, except nature’s care, a banyan tree will grow out of the seed. The seed and the banyan are the same, they are One, that’s why growth is possible.
Can we imagine God doing, making, or fabricating the Universe by assembling all its heterogeneous parts according to a plan He would have designed on a drawing board? How many parts would He need? How much maintenance and work would it require from Him? The Universe does not need any maintenance because it has no parts! Let’s try to illustrate this idea of no parts.
Take a close look at the two pictures at the top of this blog. Can you perceive a beginning or an end to the nautilus shell? Sure, we can imagine a beginning or ending point along the spiral but is it a real beginning or end? The only reality in this nautilus shell is the spiraling movement or energy of creation that suddenly becomes visible in the shape of the shell and the movement keeps on spiraling beyond the shell. When the Chinese or Japanese calligraphist starts painting his characters, the characters do not start where the calligraphist lays down his pen on the paper. Each character starts in the movement of the hand directed by the thought or the idea of the character, then becomes visible as a shape or character and the movement is going to shape a new form or character. The same principle can be applied to playing music. Music exists before and after it is perceived as music. Moreover, creation is a continuous movement so it is always happening beyond our perceptual categories of linear time and space.
What we perceive as forms is only the linear decomposition of a continuous spiral movement. This is evidenced by the rectangles that seem to be at the base of the tracing of the spiral (see figures below). This is a particular spiral called the golden spiral because it is traced according to specific length ratios of the rectangles used to trace it.
Geometers generate a golden spiral by tracing a rectangle then a vertical perpendicular that intersects the horizontal parallels of the rectangle at a precise point where the ratio between the full line (a+b) to the longest segment a is the same as the ratio between the longest segment a and the shorter segment b. In fact, the precise point
that is used to drop the vertical line defines a square within the great rectangle. So, basically a golden rectangle is obtained by tracing a vertical line at the precise point where it determines a square within the great rectangle. It is called the golden ratio, the golden section, the divine proportion, or simply the golden number.
The golden spiral is constructed from the large golden rectangle. If we remove the great square from the great golden rectangle, we obtain a small golden rectangle. Then we remove the small square from the small golden rectangle and we obtain a smaller golden rectangle. We reiterate the operation indefinitely. The operation cannot be interrupted because the length and the width of a golden rectangle are incommensurable, that is we cannot measure one by taking the other as the unit.
Geometers of the Antiquity, painters, architects, musicians used the divine proportion to build cathedrals, the pyramids, generate musical scales, etc. Leonardo Da Vinci used the golden section extensively in designing the human body. This golden section is also at work in the morphology and growth of plants.
1 does not come from 2
What geometers and mathematicians do is that they make or fabricate the unity and continuity of the spiral by assembling those multiple parts that are those squares and golden rectangles (by a theoretically infinite reiteration process) whilst in Creation the perfect continuity and unity of the spiral or the circle is not the result of a construct of rectangles, squares and polygons: it simply IS.
Remember that even circles in human constructs are an assemblage of a regular polygon with an infinite number of sides. A perfect circle, like a perfect spiral, IS, it can’t be fabricated. Don’t we find strange that the circle, which is a symbol 
of perfection, is supposed to be defined in the powerful unity of its circumference by the weird equation: C=2π•r where π=3.1415…? How can One be defined by 1+ an infinite fraction? A circle is not basically defined by a center and a radius but by itself: there is no basic difference between a dot and a circle. The radius and the center or a circle are a linear decomposition of its perfect continuity or unity. The story of π is a nightmare fabricated by mathematicians!
In biology, we talk about cell division. But do cells really divide or multiply? Do really two cells come from one cell or is it one single cell that extends itself according to the law of the golden section?
Let us look at a strange mathematical representation of One=1 through the golden number and its derivative: the Fibonacci series. We invite the reader not to scratch his or her head with the inner mathematical aspects of the formulas presented here but to see that the whole numbers are not outside of 1 as expressions of multiplicity but within 1. From the golden number obtained through the positive solution of the equation x2-x-1=0, we can obtain:
which is the Fibonacci series tending to the value of the golden number.
2 is not the result of the division of 1 to express multiplicity. 1 divided by 2 is (.)5 and 5+5=1(0). We have 5 fingers on the left hand and 5 fingers on the right hand. The unity of our body is not the assemblage of 2 parts that look like 2 halves. It is 1 that extends itself through a spiral movement and seems to be decomposed into parts according to the principle of the golden section or ratio. Forms are a perceptual effect generated by the geometrical filtering of the continuous movement of energy. The number 5 created by the golden section is the key to the multiplication of unity without any division or separation.
It is this number 5 that is expressed twice in the Tetragram YHWH under the double “H” which represents the double spiration (5-5) of the Holy Spirit linking our divine Mind with our terrestrial mind (see Blog #31: God’ DNA I). Our musical scales are built on the number 5 through the fifth note which by reiteration creates the diatonic scales.
Through the ANALOGY of the golden section, Unity can multiply itself indefinitely and infinitely without any separation, without any doing, without any work. The golden section is a great metaphor to express the real meaning of Being without any trace of separation and creating without the necessity of doing anything. Creation creates itself by oneness and sameness ad infinitum…
“God said: I say, “I AM.” Now, you, Myself, Whom I speak to now as you, say: “I AM.” This is your whole story. You ARE. You exist more than in a body. You exist. You ARE. We ARE. We ARE One. All the rest is the history of perception. The whole world is perception. Perceive the Truth, that you and I are not separate but One. As One, what do you need, and to Whom would you ask? You can only ask yourself Who art Myself.” http://heavenletters.org/mistaken-identity.html
So understanding the real meaning of ‘I need do nothing’ is understanding the meaning of TO BE. This understanding is the major key to our recalibration.
Written by Normand Bourque on Nov 22, 2013
Be First to Comment